
I've added a lot of links to the sidebar, so today I'll mostly be talking about that. First though, I'll talk a little bit about this/these piece(s). I'm not sure where the impulse in me comes from, but a lot of the work that I do is somewhat...modular?

Often, one larger work that consists of smaller works that "link" together, if you will. If I were particularly bored, or had the time and energy to devote to the task, I'd probably try to visually connect every painting/drawing/whatever I've ever done to each other to create some sort of conceptually cohesive
uber-"painting."

I've always been drawn to that sort of idea (
spiritus mundi, the
Interweb,
Voltron) for some reason, but I'd have to do a bit of ruminating about where that might come from. It's such a strong impulse that I'm tempted to say I'm emulating some great work of art that's captivated me since childhood, but off the top of my head no one thing leaps to mind. What does come to mind is the work one of my favorite authors,
John Barth, whose seventh novel (for example, though I haven't read it) is called
Letters: A Novel;
Letters (which has seven L-E-T-T-E-R-S, by the way) is told through a series of letters (what else?) written amongst seven characters, six of which, if memory serves, are primary characters from his six previous books.

If I'm anything, it's definitely a
Barthian post-modernist. When I asked Hillary where she thought it all came from or what other examples she could think of this
tendency of mine, this leaning towards larger works that are the culmination of distinct yet connected parts, she offered that I probably prefer the medium of television to film. She also, rather pithily I might add, brought up the notion of
horror vacui, which I think cut a little too close to the bone. I think she really nailed it, though I'm a bit concerned by this quote: "Many examples of horror
vacui in art come from...the mentally unstable and inmates of psychiatric hospitals."
Anyway, back to the links in the sidebar (sorry for the long post). You'll notice three categories so far, Frequent Reads, Artists, and Art Blogs. In the coming days I'll add a Galleries section with links to my favorite places to look at and purchase art. I tried my best to distinguish between "Art Blogs," which have a lot to do with art, but may also contain journal-type entries and "Artists," who feature their own work and generally do a better job than I of staying on the subject of art, but the lines are often blurry, so if you feel you've been wrongly labeled, or don't wish to be linked at all, just drop me an email. The "Frequent Reads" are all great blogs that I read on a regular basis, and I recommend that you do the same.
The Artists and Art Blog links will continue to grow at a rapid rate probably starting tomorrow, but here's a quick rundown of the folks currently on the sidebar (who aren't named Patrick or Garth ("Extreme Craft"; more on him soon though!):
I really think of
Devlin and
Dogboy as kind of the inspiration behind this blog (Sorry, Devlin and Brad!). The idea was to post old art that I've done--though not as old as Devlin's--and provide links to some cool artists, which Brad is great at. They both have some great links up right now, so go check them out!
Drew and
Eleanor are both extremely talented illustrators and cartoonists living in Athens (as do Devlin and Brad, by the way), and you should really just go look at their stuff and buy stuff from them because their work really speaks for itself.
Sara and Emily are also both in Athens and both have
Etsy stores. Feel free also to check out the blog of
Dennis Harper (another Athenian), which I'll probably discuss more at length in a future post.
Tomorrow I'll have more links and maybe some deep questions about art that I'd love feedback on. Please come back and be part of the discussion. I know the road to hell is paved with mice and men and all that but I'd really like this blog to be a place where people can come and have meaningful discussions about art and maybe get to know each other better. Thanks for reading this.
Labels: e pluribus unum