The endure decade or so, we've apparent a huge billow in spiritually based books. They've awash so able-bodied (both fiction and non) that a lot of of the big houses accept some array of airy imprint, active the area from Christian Fiction to Buddhist texts to New-Age works a la Hay House, etc. I've apparent a host of such manuscripts. Abounding of these appear from attorneys of a advanced variety; abounding are scholarly; some from writers on a airy path. The majority of these accept things in common: either they exhausted you over the arch with their "revelations" (which needs no discussion-we've all had this experience!) or they're free-form, just shy of stream-of-consciousness. And while that may absolutely be the address in which we accept the aspect of airy inspiration, it still accept to be translated into book anatomy in adjustment to be publishable, and to be attainable to the market-readers.
As with all accurate gems of knowledge, inspiration, even Truth (and isn't this why all writers write? To aback some bit, no amount how big or small, of something abstruse forth the way), the success lies in the telling.
Now, I'm not actuality to alter for or adjoin any religion, airy bent, or path, but rather as a autograph drillmaster to advice writers appearance their works into accurate and applicable books. Often the acquaint forth the way assume absolutely difficult, and oddly, the "spiritual writer" seems to accept the a lot of battle with accepting criticism and revision, as if to do so would mar the aboriginal attributes of the work.
All writers accept that abhorrence to some extent. The spiritually based ones tend to yield it to the extreme. After all, if the afflatus came from God, Spirit, The Universe, whatever you may alarm it in your acceptance system, the abstraction is "who am I to question?" I may accept absent something, but I never heard God say, "To adapt is of Satan." Although, of course, abounding writers would adjure to that in general! But in fact, the alteration itself can be as artistic a action as the antecedent inspiration. It's all in how you go about it.
This mindset, although acutely mundane, is the point of creating a plan that readers can butt and utilize. Remember-you yourself are not your alone audience. Yes, you are a basic one to amuse (that is a lot of why we write). But if you wish anyone abroad to in fact apprehend it, you accept to accompany the plan into a apparent form, and one which others can grasp.
As a book editor, I see a ton of such works that go all over the map. In added words, the alignment is off. Abounding charge a abundant narrower focus. The ideas, while they may absolutely be unique, go from Texas to Nebraska and aback after anytime bridge the Red River. E.g., you can't chase their aisle to save your danged life. After a aciculate focus and bound organization, the clairvoyant is catapulted all over the pages, clumsy to acquisition the cilia of the affair about which aggregate about the book accept to be weaved. Anniversary affiliate accept to body aloft the previous, so that your reader's compassionate and ability activate to abound from within. And that holds accurate for fiction and nonfiction.
I edited a admirable book by Gerald Morton, Never Alone in the Back, which is a accumulating of belief from an EMT about emergency calls he's worked. It aswell weaves his claimed airy path, and its evolution, through these stories, the close apery the outer, if you will, just as in a admirable novel. It was catchy authoritative this work, but Morton is a ablaze biographer (he's had both fiction and non appear by Traditional houses), and he never misses a beat. Nowhere is the clairvoyant abashed as to how these belief chronicle to anniversary added and the broader theme.
When Randy Mitchell wrote Sons in the Clouds, he didn't shy abroad from the plan I gave him. We focused on atypical development and the elements of abundant fiction. He plunged in, and revised and revised, bearing a admirable book that fires on all cylinders, and which just happens to accept an basal Godly theme. Is it airy fiction? Yes. But aboriginal and foremost, it's a abundant read. And that atypical has just been nominated for Global e-book award.
While I'm not in the addiction of touting autograph how-to books, a abundant ability exists for a added all-embracing abstraction of this. Airy Autograph by Deborah Levine Herman with Cynthia Black, discusses some of these points, as able-bodied as the business end of things-i.e., the assorted genres aural the airy market, area castigation ability fit, and how to analyze it.
The capital point here, however, is that autograph a spiritually based book is not awfully altered from autograph any abundant book-from a atypical to a chiral on adolescent care. All of them charge afflatus at the core. All crave acceptable writing. And all accept to accept the elements that accomplish up a acceptable book-theme, focus, alignment and structure, pacing, flow, active characters, showing/creating against telling, substance, voice, etc. You don't get a catholic get-out-of-editing-free advertisement just because you affirmation God as the co-author (just ask Morton or Mitchell, referenced above). Besides, I've never accepted God to be a awkward Creator OR Editor. We're appealing abundant the ones who actualize the mess. And we accept the God-given intelligence, accumulated with the assets available, to apple-pie up that mess. The action is still about writing, editing, revising, rewriting-where, of course, as in everything, the devil is in the details.